top of page

CIPM Level 2 Exam 2026: Complete Study Guide — Manager Selection, Attribution & Performance Appraisal

CIPM Level 2 Exam 2026: Complete Study Guide — Manager Selection, Attribution & Performance Appraisal
CIPM Level 2 Exam 2026: Complete Study Guide — Manager Selection, Attribution & Performance Appraisal

CIPM® Level II is where the program turns from “can you calculate and explain performance?” into “can you judge skill, diagnose drivers, and select managers in messy real-world conditions.” Officially, the Level II exam is 80 questions in 3 hours, delivered as scenarios plus multiple-choice.

That format matters: you’re not just solving isolated calculations—you’re interpreting a case, choosing the right framework, and defending an answer that’s “most appropriate” given constraints.

Below is a complete, practical guide to what to master for 2026—and how to study efficiently.


1) Understand the exam’s “shape” before you study


Exam mechanics (official):

  • Structure: 80 questions

  • Length: 3 hours

  • Format: scenarios + multiple-choice

  • Results: typically within 60 days

What this implies for strategy

  • You must practice reading and extracting what matters from a vignette quickly.

  • You need “decision rules” (which model/metric applies) more than memorizing definitions.

  • You should train with timed scenario sets, not only chapter-end questions.

CFA Institute also notes successful candidates report studying an average of 155 hours per exam.


2) Performance measurement topics at Level II: derivatives, hedging, and denominator traps


Level II expands return measurement into portfolios that break the “simple market value” assumptions—especially when notional exposure and derivatives are involved.

From the 2026 Level II learning outcomes, you should be able to:

  • Calculate and interpret returns for long–short, short extension, and market-neutral portfolios

  • Define economic (notional) exposure and notional return

  • Apply return approaches for portfolios using forwards, futures, swaps, and options

  • Handle unhedged vs partially hedged multicurrency portfolios

  • Recognize the zero or near-zero denominator problem (common in overlay strategies)

How Level II tests thisExpect scenario questions where the “math” is straightforward but the real test is:

  • choosing the correct return denominator (market value vs notional exposure)

  • explaining how a derivative position changes portfolio exposure and therefore performance interpretation

Study move: build a mini-checklist for each derivative type: what exposure is created, what’s the payoff profile, what return measure is meaningful.


3) Data integrity: reconcile discrepancies like a performance professional


Level II data integrity is less “what is data quality?” and more “why do real performance numbers disagree?”

The 2026 outcomes emphasize:

  • Causes of performance discrepancies between investment manager vs custodian

  • Causes of discrepancies between NAV-based performance vs end-of-day time-weighted performance

  • Best practices for maintaining composite data so it reliably represents a strategy

What to be able to do on exam day

  • Identify the likely root cause: corporate actions processing, pricing timing, FX rate choice, accrual conventions, treatment of fees/cash flows, or data cut-off differences.

  • Pick the best corrective action (policy, reconciliation process, exception reporting, source-of-truth governance).


4) Attribution: go beyond Brinson—multi-currency, derivatives, and fixed income


Level II attribution moves into “real portfolio” complexity:


A) Strategy benchmarks and “normal weights”

You’ll see the benchmark problem from the investment manager’s perspective:

  • Understand normal (neutral) weights

  • Distinguish published benchmark-centered disciplines vs manager strategy disciplines

  • Explain why strategy benchmarks can be more appropriate for certain manager styles

  • Understand how benchmark choice impacts attribution, tracking error, and information ratios


B) Multi-currency attribution (Karnosky–Singer)

You’re expected to calculate and interpret:

  • Asset allocation, security selection, and currency allocation effects using Karnosky–Singer

  • A geometric approach when returns aren’t continuously compounded

  • Why interest rate differentials matter in multi-currency attribution

Common trap: confusing “currency effect” with “local return effect.” Your process should always separate:

  1. local asset return

  2. FX movement

  3. (when relevant) carry/interest differentials


C) Attribution with shorts, futures, and options

You’re specifically expected to calculate and interpret attribution results for portfolios containing:

  • short positions

  • futures

  • options 

Skill test: keeping sign conventions straight (short weights, active exposures) and interpreting whether the manager’s decision added or detracted given the chosen benchmark.


D) Fixed-income attribution: know the approaches and when each is suitable

The Level II outline calls out three major fixed-income attribution approaches:

  • Exposure decomposition (duration-based)

  • Yield curve decomposition (duration-based)

  • Yield curve decomposition (full repricing)

What’s typically tested is not heavy bond math—it’s whether you can match:

  • user/decision process (rates vs spread vs curve positioning)

  • implementation complexity

  • limitations and interpretation 


5) Performance appraisal: distinguish skill from luck—then choose the right tool


Performance appraisal in Level II becomes more judgment-heavy. The learning outcomes include:

  • Distinguishing skill vs luck and spotting appraisal mistakes

  • Using quality control charts

  • Evaluating how benchmark and factor selection affects appraisal (and consequences of wrong benchmarks)

  • Understanding how cash holdings affect appraisal

  • Recognizing limits of historical performance

  • Identifying characteristics of superior active managers

  • Justifying selection of appraisal measures

  • Evaluating strategies with non-linear returns

  • Analyzing the skill of an active manager

How to think about appraisal questionsWhen you see performance numbers, ask (in this order):

  1. Is the benchmark correct? (if not, everything is contaminated)

  2. Is the risk measure consistent with the mandate? (total vs relative vs downside vs drawdown)

  3. Are returns linear? (options/convexity strategies require different evaluation tools)

  4. Is the record long and stable enough to infer skill?


Equity style analysis: “What does the manager actually do?”

The outline explicitly includes characteristic-based analysis to:

  • Understand strategy at a deeper level

  • Evaluate philosophy and risk tolerance

  • Assess performance across market environments and periods

This is a manager-selection bridge: style analysis is used to detect style drift, hidden factor bets, and whether performance is repeatable.


6) Manager selection: where Level II is won or lost


CFA Institute states Level II contains all the manager search and selection content. The 2026 outcomes cover the full lifecycle:


A) Process and due diligence fundamentals

You must be able to:

  • Place selection within the client’s IPS

  • Evaluate qualitative considerations

  • Explain the components of selection, including due diligence

  • Contrast Type I vs Type II errors in hiring/retention

  • Evaluate adherence to stated philosophy and process


B) Manager evaluation tools beyond “alpha”

Level II expects you to use measures like:

  • upside/downside capture

  • drawdown and drawdown duration

  • batting average

  • style analysis (returns-based vs holdings-based)


C) Vehicles, contracts, and fees

You’ll need to compare:

  • pooled vehicles vs separate accounts

  • contract types and key provisions

  • forms of performance-based fees and how to interpret a schedule


D) Special cases by manager type

The outline explicitly calls out special considerations for:

  • passive

  • hedge funds

  • private equity

  • real estate

  • equity vs fixed income


E) Portfolio-of-managers thinking (optimization concepts)

Later outcomes focus on:

  • utility function components for selection

  • why the utility uses active return (not total return)

  • incorporating risk and search/monitoring costs

  • optimal mix of managers

  • misfit risk and pure information ratio

  • limitations of relying on historical alphas/style boxes

  • estimating optimization inputs and why optimization often favors lower active-risk managers

This is where many candidates struggle: it’s conceptually “portfolio theory applied to managers,” not securities.


7) GIPS and performance presentation: advanced compliance logic


Level II expects you to evaluate:

  • fundamentals of compliance (firm definition, total firm assets, conditions to claim compliance)

  • discretionary vs non-discretionary classification

  • composite construction appropriateness (inclusions/exclusions, switching, significant cash flows, model/simulated linked performance)

  • presentation/reporting requirements, disclosures

  • portability of track records

  • benefits of verification

Study move: build scenario flashcards: “Portfolio has large external cash flows” / “Firm acquired a track record” / “Model portfolio linked performance” → what is allowed, what must be disclosed, what is prohibited.


A practical 7-week study plan for CIPM Level 2 Exam 2026 (built for scenarios)


Weeks 1–2: Manager selection foundation + style analysis

  • IPS context, Type I/II errors, interview/on-site logic

  • returns-based vs holdings-based style analysis, style drift detection

Week 3: Performance appraisal deepening

  • benchmark/factor selection effects, non-linear return strategy evaluation

  • quality control charts, common appraisal mistakes

Week 4: Multi-currency attribution

  • drill until decomposition is automatic; add interest differential intuition

Week 5: Fixed-income attribution approaches

  • match approach to use case; interpret outputs

Week 6: Derivatives/overlay performance measurement

  • notional exposure, long–short and market-neutral returns, denominator pitfalls

Week 7: GIPS + mixed scenario sets

  • composite construction scenarios + portability + disclosures

  • 2–3 full timed mocks of scenario blocks

Throughout: maintain an “error log” where every missed question becomes a rule (benchmark selection, sign convention, or method choice).



Final takeaway

CIPM Level II 2026 is a practitioner exam: it rewards candidates who can interpret performance—not just compute it. If you master (1) manager selection decision-making, (2) multi-currency and fixed-income attribution frameworks, (3) appraisal under benchmark/factor uncertainty, and (4) GIPS scenario logic, you’ll be prepared for both the exam and the job this credential targets.


Unlock your potential with our comprehensive CIPM Level 2 Program practice exams and study packages!


CIPM Level 2 - FGWPro® Question Bank
$199.99
Buy Now

CIPM Level 2 - Question Bank + 1 Practice Exams
$259.99
Buy Now

CIPM Level 2 - Question Bank + 2 Practice Exams + Executive Summary
$429.99
Buy Now

CIPM Level 2 - Two Practice Exams
$78.99
Buy Now

Comments


bottom of page